CAP/INFORMER:

maybe, maybe not...but WHO THE F*CK ARE YOU?

is it time to talk to dimitri?

Dimi... I miss my little victim..

Lmx, do me a favour and call him, he's run away a while ago, and hasn't been here since. run along little rabbit... lol..

L'menexe I found it necessary to get a little smart alex on you because I had asked a question that's bothering me and you responded rather wise:
===============================================
but _you're_ the one who has repeatedly made a big noise about how you had put a beating on ms mary and kim arx.
which never happened; i was there.
but clearly she left an impression on you, as you routinely mention her.
================================================

As you are aware there was a problem with previous postings under name of INFORMER coming out of my office which I had addressed. The culprits signed off but the e-mail address used in registering here remains under name of Informer and therefore, I cannot register as Capt America unless I obtain a new e-mail address which I'm not up to doing. I also demanded the password from them which they complied.

CAPT.
=
you might consider how many times last year that
ultrablade [or whoever] boasted of 'beating up'
ms.mary and kim arx too. none of it was true.
yes or no?
=

all i know is, i never stopped being "L'menexe"
and it was pretty simple; just a little typing,
adjusting your 'user account'.

I say bring back informer... lol,.

* WHAT????? I need that rabbi running around your hairy as5 to decipher that.
Your quite understandable obsession with anal sex better be referred to www.godhatesfags.com.

The zionist fanatic calling herself Delenne emanates from the same sewage pit as the jewish terrorist who butchered that 11 year old child.
I showed that picture in the office and people felt revolted, one woman felt physically sick.

These JewHadniks have been raised on a fecal diet of fanatical hate by their rabbis. Doubtless, these savages have been taught they can commit any atrocity as they are the "chosen people"

BACON:

do you often 'revolt' and 'sicken' your co-workers
with your obsession?

you share your jew-hate EVERY SINGLE DAY, BACON?
==
and you continue to have no proof re: Kisako?
while getting louder and uglier...

* I showed that picture in the office and people felt revolted, one woman felt physically sick.
It must have been Your picture.

The Sec. C. passed Resolution 1322, "condemning" Israel for "excessive use of force" in protection of the lives of soldiers and civilians, following clashes with a cocktail of Pal "civilians", uniformed Pal "Police", and Arafat's plainclothed Tanzim gangsters, the US abstained, and ridiculously explained, that a veto would have caused more Arab violence and put american lives at stake in the region."
This idealistic-provocateurish-ridiculous Amnesty Intl. "condemned" Israel in advance, then two days later announced the departure of its delegates to "investigate" the matter. Amnesty also made an arrogant idiocy of an announcement, that its reps. "would make recommendations to the Israeli government," no mention of any "recommendations" that might be directed towards the PA.
Everybody "righteously" line up to cast the first stone. The UN in 1993 in Somalia used anti-tank helicopters to mow down hostile civilians and "militia". On September 9 for in one brief engagement, the US Cobras defended a US bulldozer crew by firing anti-tank missiles and 20-mm cannon on a crowd of attacking Somalis. The UN justified the killing of almost 100 Somalis that, "Everyone on the ground in the vicinity was a combatant, because they meant to do us harm." The US soldiers referred to a "free fire zone" and complained that Somalis "call us killers of women and children, when we shoot the very same people who are shooting at us and we kill some of the people that they are using for cover."

"The United Nations forces responded with full scale attacks against General Aidid and his militia, first attacking densely populated Mogadishu from the air:
* After hours of bombardment that shook the city, United Nations troops stormed the headquarters of General Mohammed Farah Aidid early this morning, but the Somali clan leader was not there. The center of Mogadishu was transformed into a battlefield as aircraft led the assault and peacekeepers swept through the city...
* The attack began at 1:30 A.M. local time as General Aidid's neighborhood was shaken by cannon fire, missiles from Cobra helicopter gunships and a AC-130H Specter gunship [A version of the C-130, loaded with automatic cannons.] ... (New York Times, June 18,1993)
* By this evening, hospitals reported that more than 60 Somalis had been killed and an estimated
100 wounded. Two helicopter missiles landed in the yard of a French relief agency, International Action Against Hunger, killing one Somali worker and wounding seven others. (New York Times, June 18, 1993)
* ... aerial bombardments ...hit the Mogadishu radio station. The station, United Nations officials said, had been used to broadcast anti-United Nations messages and incite actions against the peacekeeping force. (New York Times, June 18, 1993)
The UN envoy in Somalia, retired US Admiral Jonathan Howe, laid the blame for civilian deaths squarely on General Aidid:
* Admiral Howe accused General Aidid of using women and children as shields for gunmen, saying that the general's faction had organized the demonstrations and that he would be held responsible for the deaths. (New York Times, June 18, 1993)
That day of June 6 attacks against Pakistani soldiers, the Sec. C. passed Resolution 837, which:
* condemned the unprovoked armed attacks against [UN] personnel ... which appear to have been part of a calculated and premeditated series of cease-fire violations ...
* [urged] member states to contribute, on an emergency basis, military support and transportation, including armoured personnel carriers, tanks and attack helicopters to provide ... the capability appropriately to confront and deter armed attacks ...
Thus while Israel has been condemned by the UN for very limited use of tanks and helicopters, the UN itself called for increasing use of such weapons in Somalia.

"After botched raid, 18 US Soldiers and up to 500 Somalis are killed in half-day battle. Firefights and ambushes continued for several months culminating in an ill-fated attempt on October 3 by US Rangers and Special Forces to capture dozens of Aidid's senior aides. The raid went awry when
first one and then another Cobra helicopter was shot down by Somalis using RPG's. Refusing to abandon the body of a dead pilot trapped in the wreckage of one of the helicopters, US forces instead formed a perimeter around the crash site, attempted to extricate the body, and called for reinforcements. The soldiers trapped near the downed choppers soon faced a withering assault from Aidid's men, who were armed with AK-47's and RPG's. The reinforcement attempts and the effort to hold the position, while heroic, caused massive casualties. The eventual rescue, employing tanks and armored personnel carriers, added to the bloodshed. According to one report:
* At least 300 Somalis are believed to have been killed during the street fighting in Mogadishu on October 3, and hundreds of women and children were among the 700 treated in hospitals after the battle.... "There was tremendous carnage involved," a Pentagon official said. [...]
Many of these casualties were due to fire from US helicopters, which were reported to have let loose with 75,000 rounds and 63 anti-tank missiles in the 14 hour battle. (Gannett News Service, November 22, 1993)
US Army spokesmen asserted that, high civilian casualtiesnotwithstanding, the US had not used excessive force, nor breached international laws, and the Somalis themselves bore the ultimate responsibility, since they used civilian shields and had started the firefight:
* From all reports, the nature and degree of force used ... did not exceed what was necessary to counter this escalating fire and was consistent with the right of self-defense under international law...
It has been our experience that the Somali gunmen who have opposed us have frequently used women and children
and, at times, have worn women's clothing, to cover their movements and to protect them from attack. These gunmen do not wear uniforms or distinctive insignia; they do not carry arms openly; they are not led by accountable military leadership; they are not subject to military discipline and they do not comply with international law. It is they who initiated the firefight and who bear ultimate responsibility for this tragic loss of life.(Statement by US Central Command as reported in New York Times, October 14, 1993; emphasis added)

"When US soldiers were trapped by much larger Somali forces in the October battle mentioned above, the US rescued them at the cost of more than 500 Somali lives. When Israeli soldiers were under siege at Joseph's Tomb in Nablus, with Cpl. Yosef Madhat seriously wounded by gunfire, an Israeli request to Palestinian forces to allow his evacuation was refused.
Senior IDF commanders ignored pleas from the trapped soldiers that the officer as dying, and did not employ nearby armored forces to effect a rescue, stating later that they wanted to avoid escalation and the attendant bad publicity:
* If we had sent in tanks and heavy weapons to take out a wounded soldier, it would not only have caused an escalation in events, but imagine how it would look to the rest of the world. (Jerusalem Post, October 3, 2000)
Instead, Israel protected Palestinian lives by not trying to extricate the wounded officer, who, after four hours, bled to death.

"On December 16th four unarmed US Marine officers driving in Panama City took a wrong turn and encountered a military roadblock near the Noriega headquarters, at which point:
* Panamanian soldiers tried to pull the Americans out of their car and then opened fire when they fled, killing one and wounding another in the ankle. (New York Times, December 19, 1989)
These US soldiers made a fatally wrong turn, in an incident eerily reminiscent of the case of the two Israeli army reservists who made a wrong turn into the Palestinian-controlled town of Ramallah. There are differences, however: the Israeli reservists were brutally lynched in the Ramallah police station, but there is no evidence that Panamanian soldiers would have lynched or even killed the Americans had they not fled. The US reaction to the killing of its soldier was swift and severe.

"In response to this attack on American soldiers, which
President Bush described as an "enormous outrage," the United States, on December 20th, invaded Panama. The US invasion force was 20,000 strong, including elements of the 82nd Airborne Division and the 6th Mechanized
Brigade. The US order of battle included mortars, APC's (Armored Personnel Carriers), Sheridan tanks, and A-64 Apache helicopters firing Hellfire anti-tank missiles. Additionally, US forces employed F-117 Stealth fighter-bombers, which made their combat debut, dropping 2000 pound bombs near Panamanian barracks at Rio Hato (New York
Times, December 24, 1989). Finally, the US also used the lethal AC-130 gunship, which is:
* ... equipped with a frightening array of 20-mm canon, 7.62-mm Gatling guns and even 105-mm howitzers that fire 40-pound shells .... [The AC-130] can lay down 17,000 rounds of ammunition a minute in a pulverizing stream of bullets. (Newsweek, January 1, 1990)