OH WELL...TODAY BEING SUNDAY, WHAT'S A SINGLE,LONELY LADY TO DO? EVEN THOUGH I HAD MY WEEKLY SATURDAY NIGHT BATH, GUESS I'LL SPEND THE DAY CLEANING AND POLISHING MY DUMP TRUCK. PROBABLY GO INTO THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT AND CHANGE THE OIL TO. THE BATH AND DEODERANT SHOULD LAST THROUGH THE WEEK

www.tenc.net [emperors-clothes]

I am a former secretary to a California-based Citizen's Committee set up to monitor the International Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ITY) since its establishment.

I resigned in 1997 but you will find me in an article I had sent to the Tribunal and the Secretary General of the United Nations as a reprint from the Paris-based trilingual journal Dialogue (no 20,1996). It is entitled "Contextualizing Hate-The Hague Tribunal, the Clinton Administration and the Serbs." A copy is enclosed. (1)

The ITY was set-up, under open indictments, ostensibly to punish all those involved in the armed intra-ethnic conflicts who killed innocent civilians since 1991. It became obvious by the third year of its operation that the Tribunal's Prosecutor pursued only the Serbs as alleged criminals in a tripartite conflict.

In one prominent case, two high-ranking officers of the Bosnian Serb Army were kidnapped in Sarajevo after Dayton and delivered to the Hague without being accused of anything. This is the case which led to a change from open to secret indictments to pre-empt additional accusations against a Tribunal with an anti-Serb bias impossible to mask.

Although two Chief Prosecutors have followed the one from South Africa and although some alleged criminals of Croat and Bosnian Muslim background were indicted, there is hardly any doubt that the reality emerging in the first three years of ITY's work is the same. It pursued mainly Serbs. This is also confirmed by the fact that the alleged Croat and Bosnian Muslim criminals have been accused of doing harm to one another's civilian populations but not to Serb civilians. It is only in the most recent times that the ITY has looked at all at what was done to the Serb civilians in Western Slavonia (August 1991- March 1992) and Krajina (2) (mainly August 1995). This was done only under pressure from a variety of complaints.

Against this background, it is not surprising that you have rejected international (not only Serb) claims that NATO committed war crimes without mentioning the other two areas in ITY indictments, those of crimes against humanity and peace. (3)

You simply did not have the will and courage to bite the hands that feed you as the major NATO players in the 78 days of bombing are also the major supporters and financial backers of your Tribunal. (4)

Nor is it surprising that you have claimed to have been "stupefied" to "even hear" Russia's claims that the ITY is "politicized" and "biased" against the Serbs. At this point it seems salutary to show you just how the Tribunal is really polluted with political considerations.

Murderer at large

Tuzla is a major NATO base in Bosnia. One of its Discotheques is run by Nasir Oric. He was the Bosnian Muslim Commander at Srebrenica. He happens to be a self-admitted war criminal of the most bestial kind. For nearly a year, from the UN-protected Srebrenica, Oric and his "elite corps" raided its Serb countryside. They destroyed 48 Serb villages, looting, torching and killing about 1,800, including women and children.

The good old Ottoman art of impaling was "enhanced" by roasting the victims of the mujehadin alive on the spit. May we send you the photographs of [partly carbonized] victims? This is what led to the Serb capture of Srebrenica, the evacuation of its women and children, and the flight of the Muslim soldiers under Izetbegovic's orders, to northern Bosnia. Oric bragged to at least two foreign reporters and showed one of them a video tape of the mayhem. You do not even have a "secret" indictment against him under the bogus claim that he had been" killed." He will not be grabbed by the NATO troops and sent to the Hague out of fear that this would alienate and radicalize the Bosnian Muslims against NATO ground personnel.

Exactly the same type of fear of alienating NATO's allies concerns the case of Agim Ceku, General of the Kosovo Liberation Army. (5) He is now a major player in what is happening in Kosovo but you have excluded Kosovo's Albanians from the category of war criminals since the war at Kosovo is defined as an internal civil war while Bosnia was internationalized in order to get at the Serbs. Actually, you are seeking evidence of mass murders of Albanian civilians at Kosovo from which to shore-up an indictment against Milosevic (curiously made public after Judge Arbour's visit to Madeleine Albright, ITY's "Mother" in Washington), stemming from the Bosnian conflict. Yet, Agim Ceku was a general of the Croat Army responsible for the ethnic cleansing of Krajina in August 1995, the looting and torching all of the Serb properties as well as killing several hundred, probably more, of older Serbs who either could not or would not run. Agim Ceku is now saluted by NATO troops and remains the behind-the-scenes coordinator of the ex-KLA. To grab him and ship him to the ITY at the Hague could alienate the still-extant KLA from NATO and impel some of its more extreme elements to cause harm to the NATO and U.N personnel in situ.

Clearly, Madame Prosecutor, your Tribunal is "politicized" as is documented beyond refutation by the two cases. Both Oric and Ceku should have been indicted, tried and sentenced long ago if your Tribunal really belonged to a civilized judicial system, with the mechanics of a real court of law. It is an instrument of an emerging neo-Nazism. What makes it Right is the Might of NATO and more specifically the U.S. Super-Power. Its would be lofty ends justify the dirtiest of means and humiliations of Serbs in particular.

The ITY is a tragi-comic political theater, draped in judicial robes, engaged in over-blown acting and pompous self-esteem, providing endless perqs and high-paying remunerations, a "sweetheart deal" for those "pre-selected" to sit on it and most unlikely to oppose any secret indictments or pre-conceived verdicts against the Serbs.

Let me now pass on the components of your rejection. You have not denied in any known instance that the accusations against NATO indeed fall within the Tribunal's mandate from the Security Council. In fact, one of the key assignments in your Security Council mandate demands it. However, you tabled, in the American sense, for the time being these accusations because you were "too busy searching for mass graves at Kosovo." Well, your legal staff acted pretty fast as the accusations were multiplying in several European countries and in the United States. You are, I am sure, at least aware that Citizens Tribunals have been working for some time to indict NATO leaders and principal actors as having committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and against peace. In rejecting the war-crimes charge you are quoted to have said that while "accidents" have taken place, you are "satisfied that there was no deliberate targeting of civilians." I am not sure what evidence you examined in person but the numbers of churches, schools, non-military factories, water purifying facilities, heating oil depositories and even medical facilities fully or partially destroyed, add up to staggering numbers. ALL OF THEM ARE CIVILIAN TARGETS EVEN IF A SINGLE CIVILIAN WAS NOT DIRECTLY KILLED IN ANY. Targeting all of them could not have been an "accident." If you need another proof of NATO war crimes here it is and you can look it up. In her 10th May last speech at the University of California's Berkeley Campus, Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright admitted: "to have raised the bar" high enough so that "Milosevic could NOT jump over it" because "YUGOSLAVIA NEEDED A LITTLE BOMBING." This is a prima facie confession of the "Mother" of your Tribunal. It refers to the addition of Appendix B at Rambouillet after the Serbs were ready to sign an agreement to restore Autonomy to Kosovo. Appendix B demanded the occupation of Yugoslavia, including Belgrade, by NATO troops. The intent is deliberate bombing of a country and not even you can exclude its civilian population simply because you do not have the courage to practice law instead of politics.

There is also a memo, which your legal toadies could not somehow excavate from the NATO files. It reveals the change from going exclusively after military targets into the civilian ones. It is a prima facie document showing that CIVILIAN TARGETS WERE DELIBERATELY INCLUDED after the initial bombings failed to produce Milosevich's signature to the main text and Appendix B of the proposed Rambouillet Accord. I am sure that you must be aware how ridiculous is the claim of NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson that the "alliance acted entirely in accordance with international law." It is illegal, under extant International Law, by international convention, to secure Presidential signatures with a pointed gun and the threat to use it. It is further illegal under International Law to mount 78 days of bombing a sovereign state without a mandate from the Security Council. The U.N. Charter demands it but it was shredded instead. As there was not even a formal declaration of war, the Constitutions of at least two member-states, France and the United States, were violated because they allot that power to declare war only to their respective Legislatures. Lord Robertson is simply extending ad infinitum the lies and propaganda used first to mount the NATO attack and later to whitewash this collective crime and its aftermath. You cannot negate the physical evidence of destruction from the air in Yugoslavia (which still includes in theory Kosovo itself), enshrined with pictures, names, dates and targets actually hit. The Yugoslav government has published four factual volumes that need no further discussion about authenticity. No one can deny that civilian targets have been extensively hit. Figures for civilian deaths and for those injured more or less seriously do vary. Some 3000 dead have been claimed at the maximum with three times that number for the maimed. On the lowest end about 300 dead and some 2,000 injured are on hand. We even have a visually recorded tragedy in the complaints of General Clark that NATO's civilian authorities would not allow him to "further extend" the number of civilian targets, another item of evidence "missed."

Clearly, Madame Prosecutor, your entire case for rejection rests only on the presumed lack of INTENT to punish the Serb civilians. The intent is clearly admitted by the U.S. Secretary of State more than a year after the bombs stopped falling on civilian targets in Yugoslavia. The INTENT WAS TO ACTUALLY PUNISH YUGOSLAVIA. How much more proof do you need to shed your judicial glaucoma and see the real shapes of dead Serbs and Albanians from NATO bombs, parachuted mines, cluster bombs (many unexploded and killing daily), shells with depleted uranium which will be hitting local genes for decades to come since it is a mutant without known limits? When you were appointed to replace Louise Arbour, a reputation preceded you from your native Switzerland. Its criminal elements and its politicians could not "crack" your judicial integrity. In fact, they deflected you because of it, like "The Godfather" of Mario Puzo, with an offer you could not refuse. It is a pity that what ordinary criminals and local politicos could not do has been reversed by the heady brew of rendering some sort of "international justice". It is curious that you "missed" a major collective crime committed under the open sky -- rockets and cluster bombs against Sunday markets, against bridges, passenger trains and busses by day, maternity hospitals by night.

Sincerely, Raymond K. Kent

LAST ONE OUT PLEASE SHUT OFF THE LIGHTS. THANK YOU..

Hairy Mary when was the last time you received cunnilingus?

Dimitri turns to Allah

Chechen Rebels Report Suicide Car Attack

Reuters
Jun 11 2000 5:44PM ET


MOSCOW (Reuters) - Chechen rebels said a former Russian soldier turned separatist fighter had blown up a car bomb at a checkpoint on Sunday, killing himself and four Russian servicemen.

Rebel spokesman Movladi Udugov, speaking by satellite telephone from an undisclosed location, said the attack had occurred in the shattered Chechen capital Grozny in the early evening.

Russian media made no mention of such an incident and officials were unavailable for comment.

``The attack occurred close to the bus station. Dzhabrailov Sergeyev, previously known as Dmitry, blew up the car when Russian servicemen came over to check what he was doing,'' Udugov said.

``He went to his death voluntarily and willingly, saying it was for Allah. Four servicemen also died as a result and five to 10 people were injured.''

Dzhabrailov Sergeyev, previously known as Dmitry>>
What the crap?...Dzhabrailov, Sergeyev means two different persons, or Dzhabrail (former Dmitry)Sergeyev turns to allah only in a way of forsed heavy using of gashish, or more possible-remote operating bomb was installed in a car with control in chechehs hands. Trying to impress media opinion by any ways, bastards?... Next time send full bus with field commanders and threir wives, with Basaev in a driver seat, you can take also balalaika as a rupor....Allahoo akbarr!

All American wrote
>>>except your logic proves that it wasn't a withdrawl as much as it was a retreat. >>>


withdrawl!

no, retreat!

rhetorics, yo silly Jew hater, nothing but silly and pointless rhetorics. Barak simply handed over the territory to a gang of exremists in the name of the good will. Speaking of which - have a Ukrainian bagel on me.

Azerbaijan, USA seen pursuing anti-Russian goals in Karabakh

`Nezavisimaya Gazeta'
3 Jun 00

[Article by doctor of political sciences Arkadiy Vartanyan: "Karabakh: Model of Caucasus. Swap of Territories Unacceptable for Russia"]

The possibility of a swap of territories between Armenia and Azerbaijan as one of the possible ways of settling the Karabakh conflict has been the main issue of sharp political collisions
in Yerevan for a long time now. At issue is the plan put forward by US diplomacy back before the truce (1994). The plan envisions that the territory of Karabakh within the borders of the former [Nagorno-Karabakh] Autonomous Region should be incorporated in Armenia in exchange of a portion of Armenian territory on the border with Iran, which separates Azerbaijan and the Nakhichevan enclave - a territory under Azerbaijan's jurisdiction.

For almost 10 years now the Karabakh crisis has been used as the main tool for speculation about the geopolitical processes taking place in the South Caucasus. The Americans, who are trying
to assume control of the so-called Russia's "underbelly", do not conceal their intention to get a foothold in this region by any means. We have to admit the circumstances are favourable for
achieving this goal. Aside from territorial conflicts greatly exacerbated by ethnic and religious factors, these circumstances include a charged domestic political atmosphere typical of all Transcaucasus states, being a result of the obvious economic weakness and amorphousness of Russia's foreign policy in recent years. Taking into account the special features of the
geopolitical alignment of forces in the recent period this factor, probably, plays the greatest role.

In its interpretation of the Karabakh problem the anti-Russian strategy emphasizes one of the fundamental norms of international law - the territorial integrity principle. Without making
any efforts to view the content of this legal norm from the perspective of the actual causes of the conflict and of the postwar realities, not only are the United States, Turkey, and Azerbaijan stepping up pressure on Armenia and
the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic in order to place it back under Azerbaijan's jurisdiction; in essence, they are blackmailing Russia with possible pessimistic prospects of the Chechen
problem. Meanwhile, obvious attempts to present the Karabakh and Chechnya conflicts as being identical are not only very dubious; they are absolutely illegitimate both in their essence and in light of international law. Ever since its first day Chechen separatism has been actively assisted from the outside. Through all these years the United States and their allies have jointly contributed to its financial and military-technical support, including by sending mercenaries from various countries and
rendering propaganda and political assistance.

In light of the above, the events in Chechnya are nothing but infringement on Russia's territorial integrity involving open use of outside forces. As a matter of fact, it is the epitome of the very threat to peace and stability the aforementioned norm of international law is supposed to counteract. In the Karabakh conflict everything is exactly different. Throughout its
short Soviet history the Azerbaijani mini-empire artificially created by the Bolshevik commissars tried rudely and not always unsuccessfully to assimilate hundreds of thousands of "nonindigenous citizens" - Lezgins, Talysh, Kurds, Tats, Kumyks, and Avars. During the break-up of the USSR, Azerbaijan, naturally, did not want to part with Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory
where an overwhelming majority of residents were Armenians, who in full compliance with the applicable Soviet Constitution, based on a legally conducted referendum, decided to secede from Azerbaijan and reunite with Armenia.

The expression of the will of the Karabakh Armenians, which was fully in keeping with every nation's right to independence (the other equivalent fundamental norm of international law) triggered the well-known reaction on the part of Azerbaijan. Mass pogroms and massacres of Armenians took place in Sumgait, Kirovabad,
and Baku; then, with the help of the Soviet troops the notorious checkup of compliance with passport regulations was held in a great number of [Azerbaijan's] towns and villages inhabited
by Armenians; finally, independent Azerbaijan, which gained independence based on the same norms of the Soviet Constitution, unleashed a large-scale war against Nagorno-Karabakh. The results
of the war that were deplorable for Azerbaijan are widely known; incidentally, Arab, Pakistani, Afghani, Turkish, and Chechen (led by Shamil Basayev) mercenaries fought infamously on
Azerbaijan's side.

Even if we disregard the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the arguments of territorial integrity being cited in this context in favour of Azerbaijan do not stand criticism when viewed against the backdrop of the actual causes of
the Karabakh conflict, whose outset is being intentionally, albeit erroneously linked to the period of the USSR's break-up. Both former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region and the Nakhichevan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic were illegally detached from Armenia and placed under Azerbaijan's jurisdiction in line with well-known decisions taken by the Caucasus Bureau of the Russian Communist Party of the Bolsheviks, which was a party organ of a third country, not a state body, immediately after Sovietization of the Transcaucasus. This blatant violation of
each and every international legal norm was made with the help of very active diplomatic pressure exerted by Turkey, which was back then regarded as one of the main allies [of Soviet Russia] in the struggle for worldwide victory of communism. Therefore, if the territorial integrity principle is applicable in this context, it can be applied exclusively in favour of Armenia, which was robbed long before the ongoing stage of the conflict.

When viewed in the context of the aforesaid, the abovementioned possibility of a swap of territories acquires a truly anecdotal tinge for Armenia: "Give me your shirt and I'll give back the blazer I once stole from you."

There is absolutely no doubt that once the southern part of Armenia has been placed under Azerbaijan's jurisdiction or under the control of the so-called international force, the door to
the South Caucasus will be slammed in Russia's face finally and irreversibly. Then, taking into account the realities similar to those existing in Chechnya, the same may be accomplished in the
North Caucasus. Let us hope the scenario will not be as grim, and that the latest resolute statements by Russia's political leadership will prove to be a true omen of a U-turn towards
persistent protection of the national interests of both our own country and of countries that are our obvious strategic allies. After all, the bargaining over Nagorno-Karabakh is not only aimed at estimating the "cost" of settling the conflict itself; in truth, the price for the whole Caucasus is being estimated.

Anyone has any blow? Because I got this assignment tomorrow, you know, they want Mikola to drive their sraniy bus with TNT straight into this medical facility in Argun full of Moskal doctors. Did I say doctors? I meant Russian murderers, of course.

LONG LIVE THE LARD!

By Gonzo ( - 208.23.220.30) on Tuesday, June 6, 2000 - 05:46 pm:
>Antonio, you are a peace of work, you do keep
>this board interesting.
> Lets see the "U.S. invented communism and
>foisted it upon the Russians." Wow that means
>the US ran the world even before WWI , the US
>has been a hyper power longer than I thougth.

The US has always been just one of the tools of the global Illuminati/Masonic/Jewish cabal

> OK I will byte so the U.S. created communism
>and a few billion dollars from one US senator
>caused the overthrow of the monarchy (otherwise
>known as a dictatorship) that has been around in
>Russia for hundreds of years.

That US senator worked through the Wall Street firm of Berriman Brothers. There were others involved - the Warburgs and Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (more Jews and Illuminati members).


> Plus this over throw took place with out the
>support of a good amount of the Russian people
>(because life was so great for the average
>Russian under the Czars).

Envy of the aristocracy had to be sown amongst the people by the Freemasons. But even while ordinary life was a struggle for the Russian people, they did not want the Bolshevik bandits to overthrow their Czar. It doesn't take the backing of the people to launch a revolution, as the syphilitic George Washington and his henchmen in America proved, but only enough wealth and the connections provided by Freemasons and the perfidious Jews.


> Then the US fought in Korea, Vietnam and
>thousands of other small places to stop the
>spread of communism...why would they do this.

The US never fought in Korea, Vietnam or any other place to stop the spread of communism. Korea, and Vietnam were firstly, UN wars, and their stated purpose was not to stop the spread of communism. The reason for the wars was to spread the New World Order. Vietnam in particular was undertaken by the US with the unstated purpose of murdering a lot of Catholics and other innocent civilian. The US, very simply, is a bloodthirsty lustful rapacious entity that takes pleasure in murdering people.
That is why Americans are such a cold-blooded killer rapist people. If you doubt that then turn on the 6 o'clock news.

> Oh I know , I have got it all figured out....

That would be a surprise.

>The US forces communism on Russia and along with
>the Jews (as Antonio pointed out) puts Hitler in
>office in Germany in order to control all of
>Europe under an Iron fist because the US planned
>on having Germany defeat all of Western Europe
>but the dam British spoil that plan by not being
>defeated so the US then turns Germany on Russia
>hoping the Russians would defeat them and have
>just one Iron fist over all of Europe. Just to
>make things "look good" the US sends in troops
>to fight in WWII , that way if Russia doesn't
>win the Americans would have troops in Europe to
>control things. After WWII a problem for the
>Americans begins to surface. The USA doesn't
>control some mines in Kosovo so the US then
>begins to tear down communism slowly , Korea,
>Vietnam (Ok that one didn't work out), but
>weaken Russia to a point where it could not
>respond to the US when it created tensions in
>Serbia (which never existed before) in a
>devilish plot to take control of a couple of
>mines in Kosovo which are valued at well above
>20 million........

The hope for the world is now on Russia which refuses to cave in and kiss the US ass.


>Ladies and Gents I give you the ultimate
>conspiracy theory.

There is only one Great Conspiracy, which is the devil's conspiracy against God.


>Oh by the way it wasn't Yoko the US government
>broke up the Beetles.

Good riddance to the Buddhist Beatles.

---

By Gonzo ( - 208.23.220.30) on Tuesday, June 6, 2000 - 06:08 pm:
>Antonio come on "St. John Salvi murdered in
>prison by US regime death squads". For anyone
>who desn't know what Antonio is talking about
>this John Salvi guy a couple years ago walks in
>to a womens clinic and kills two un-armed
>secretaries.

It was not a "womens clinic", but an abortion chamber, and St. John Salvi justifiably executed to abortionist assistants. The abortionists and their assistants were armed with scalpels, forceps, and saline solutions which they deployed against the preborn infants in their mothers' wombs.

>The guy is convicted and senticed to life in
>prison even though John Salvi himself asks for
>the death penalty.

St. John Salvi was wrongfully convicted by an outlaw Masonic/Jew kangaroo court. The perfidious Jews also handed over their King Jesus Christ to be executed by Pagans. We Roman Catholics are not in the least surprised by the criminal actions of the Masonic/Jewish US regime courts. How many people even know that the B'nai B'rith is actually the Jews special branch of the Masonic Lodge?

> After a while in the joint he strangled and
>killed himself.

That is just what the Masonic/Jewish media propagated. In fact, St. John Salvi was found on the floor underneath his bed with his hands and feet tied and a plastic bag over his head. As anyone who has ever tried to hold their breath underwater in a swimming pool knows, when you are suffocating you will desperately seek air, and nobody could kill themselves in this manner because even if they willed to do it their own body would reflexively grab and tear at any obstruction of the airways as the victim starts to lose consciousness. St. John Salvi was murdered, and it is a testament to the monumental lying ability and propensity of the US regime and its cohorts that they would absurdly claim that St. John Salvi killed himself.


> So in other words Antonio thinks "speaking the
>truth and acting on the truth" is the same as
>gunning down two ladies.

They were not two ladies. They were two butchers and deserved what they got. It is not a sin for the people to execute murderers or defend the innocent and the helpless. It is a sin to allow abortionists to live.


> Salvi was not convited of a "Hate crime" he was
>convicted of two murders.

He was not convicted by a legitimate court. He was convicted by a kangaroo US military court, which had no jurisdiction over him. St. John Salvi was the victim of a criminal court which unjustly tried and unjustly sentenced him, and then he was murdered by agents of the US abortion regime.

May the people in America rise up and shoot all the abortionists and all those who work for the abortion chambers.

St. John Salvi, ora pro nobis!

---