Archive through Mar...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Archive through March 1, 2000

125 Posts
22 Users
0 Reactions
30.4 K Views
(@betterthanyou)
Reputable Member
Joined: 25 years ago
Posts: 386
 

Dimitri,
I may have been wrong, wasn't it "Slovach" that professed to be a Nazi. My mistake if so.


   
ReplyQuote
(@dimitri)
Noble Member
Joined: 17 years ago
Posts: 2221
 

Better,
yea..Slovak was the one - seemed to be a huge Hitler/Hider admirer..we did him good though..


   
ReplyQuote
(@beterthanyou)
New Member
Joined: 25 years ago
Posts: 1
 

Dimitri,
It's been a while my access to this board was revoked for a while. Couldn't tell ya why, Ha! If I can recall we were tag teaming dumbass slovak. Sorry about mis-identifying you.


   
ReplyQuote
(@kisako)
Reputable Member
Joined: 25 years ago
Posts: 252
 

While "relocating" hostages bandits shot the Itar-TASS photographer, kept hostage, dead.


   
ReplyQuote
(@gonzo)
Reputable Member
Joined: 25 years ago
Posts: 397
 

Kisako, I remember reading after the embassy got hit Numerous countries phoned up the Petagon with the adresses of theirs. Anyway "military attaches", I really can't comment on this because I don't know if this is true or not, but I will take your word on it. In response my question would be did these military attaches have any say in target designation or involved at all with the maps used for target designation? another point, why would the US hit the embassy on purpose? Its counter productive not to mention an internation innsodent (sp).

"elimnation of serbia as a whole?" No that was never the military objective. Being that this was a war fought by committee. The air-forces involved didn't fight in the most prudent way in a military sence like the rule of not going below 15,000 feet led to less effective bombing.


   
ReplyQuote
Page 9 / 9
Share: